Machine Learning-Based Sentiment Classification for Detecting Financial Misinformation on Social Media

Main Article Content

Robert Situmorang
Yunus Yulianus

Abstract

Financial misinformation on social media is difficult to identify because misleading posts often combine emotionally charged language, incomplete evidence, promotional claims, and technically plausible financial terminology. This conceptual technical review examines how machine-learning sentiment classification can be incorporated into a broader detection pipeline for financial misinformation. The review synthesizes literature on financial-domain language models, deception detection, sentiment analysis, feature engineering, and human-in-the-loop verification. It proposes a modular architecture consisting of data acquisition, text normalization, financial sentiment representation, misinformation-risk classification, explanation, and reviewer escalation. The analysis shows that sentiment is useful as a contextual signal but is insufficient as a stand-alone indicator because legitimate financial communication may also be strongly positive or negative. Robust systems should combine contextual embeddings, source and propagation features, claim-evidence consistency, calibration, and explainable outputs. Evaluation should report precision, recall, F1-score, area under the curve, calibration error, and performance across topics and time periods. The proposed architecture provides an engineering-oriented foundation for developing transparent financial misinformation screening systems without treating automated classification as a substitute for professional verification.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Machine Learning-Based Sentiment Classification for Detecting Financial Misinformation on Social Media. (2026). Journal of Applied Science and Technology in Engineering, 1(1), 43-51. https://jurnal.aretelitera.com/jaste/article/view/42

References

Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S., Bennett, P. N., Inkpen, K., Teevan, J., Kikin-Gil, R., & Horvitz, E. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233

Araci, D. (2019). FinBERT: Financial sentiment analysis with pre-trained language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.10063

Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011). Information credibility on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 675-684). ACM.

Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Vol. 1, pp. 4171-4186). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423

Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014). A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(4), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2523813

Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (Vol. 70, pp. 1321-1330). PMLR.

Huang, A. H., Wang, H., & Yang, Y. (2023). FinBERT: A large language model for extracting information from financial text. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2), 806-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12832

Kwon, S., Cha, M., Jung, K., Chen, W., & Wang, Y. (2013). Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 1103-1108). IEEE.

Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (pp. 4765-4774). Curran Associates.

Nam, D., & Skillicorn, D. B. (2023). Detecting pump&dump stock market manipulation from online forums. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.11403

Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors, 52(3), 381-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810376055

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007

Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135-1144). ACM.

Saito, T., & Rehmsmeier, M. (2015). The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0118432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118432

Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600

Shu, K., Wang, S., & Liu, H. (2019). Beyond news contents: The role of social context for fake news detection. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 312-320). ACM.

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

Zhang, X., Du, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2022). A theory-driven machine learning system for financial disinformation detection. Production and Operations Management, 31(8), 3160-3179. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13743

Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D. (2004). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(1), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011944.62889.6f