ADOPSI KECERDASAN BUATAN DALAM MANAJEMEN KUALITAS: PELUANG, TANTANGAN, DAN KERANGKA STRATEGIS UNTUK EKONOMI BERKEMBANG

Main Article Content

Erika Meiliana
Faizunal Adhmi
Jisamsu

Abstract

Purpose-This article explains how organizations in emerging economies can adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in quality management without reproducing infrastructure, capability, and governance models designed for resource-rich settings. Design/methodology/approach-An integrative literature review synthesizes research on Quality 4.0, AI-enabled quality control, technology adoption, responsible AI, dynamic capabilities, and development constraints, supplemented by evidence from the World Bank and UN Trade and Development. Findings-AI creates value through augmented inspection, predictive prevention, process optimization, customer-feedback intelligence, traceability, and organizational learning. These benefits are constrained by fragmented data, limited connectivity and compute, skills shortages, vendor dependence, explainability and bias risks, cybersecurity, and weak accountability. The proposed Quality-AI Readiness and Responsible Adoption (QAR-RA) framework sequences adoption through six gates: strategic quality problem, foundational readiness, bounded pilot, human-governed validation, scaled integration, and continuous assurance. Four cross-cutting enablers-leadership, workforce capability, ecosystem collaboration, and proportionate governance-support every gate. Originality/value-The article shifts the debate from technology acquisition to quality-value realization under constraint. It integrates quality management discipline with responsible AI and development readiness, and provides a staged framework suitable for SMEs and other organizations in emerging economies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ADOPSI KECERDASAN BUATAN DALAM MANAJEMEN KUALITAS: PELUANG, TANTANGAN, DAN KERANGKA STRATEGIS UNTUK EKONOMI BERKEMBANG. (2026). Journal of Quality Management and Business (JQMB), 1(1), 37-44. https://jurnal.aretelitera.com/jqmb/article/view/47

References

Asif, M. (2020). Are QM models aligned with Industry 4.0? A perspective on current practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120820

Badghish, S., & Soomro, Y. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption by SMEs to achieve sustainable business performance: Application of technology–organization–environment framework. Sustainability, 16(5), 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051864

Chiarini, A., & Kumar, M. (2020). What is Quality 4.0? An exploratory sequential mixed methods study of Italian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 60(16), 4890–4910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1942285

International Organization for Standardization & International Electrotechnical Commission. (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Information technology—Artificial intelligence—Management system.

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Significance of Quality 4.0 towards comprehensive enhancement in manufacturing sector. Sensors International, 2, 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100109

Liu, H.-C., Liu, R., Gu, X., & Yang, M. (2023). From total quality management to Quality 4.0: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10, 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0243-z

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD/LEGAL/0449.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sony, M., Antony, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2020). Essential ingredients for the implementation of Quality 4.0: A narrative review of literature and future directions for research. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0275

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

UN Trade and Development. (2025). Technology and Innovation Report 2025: Inclusive artificial intelligence for development. United Nations.

World Bank. (2025). Digital Progress and Trends Report 2025: Strengthening AI foundations. World Bank.