Peer Review Process

This journal implements a peer review process to ensure the quality, scientific validity, and academic contribution of each published manuscript.

Initial Stage (Editorial Screening)

All submitted manuscripts are first evaluated by the editor to ensure compliance with the journal’s focus and scope, as well as administrative and formatting requirements.

Review System

This journal applies a Double-Blind Peer Review system, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure objectivity.

Review Process

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening will be sent to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. The evaluation includes:

• Originality and scientific contribution
• Relevance to the journal’s focus and scope
• Research/methodology quality
• Clarity of analysis and discussion
• Relevance and recency of references

Review Decision

Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editor will make one of the following decisions:

• Accepted without revision
• Accepted with minor revisions
• Accepted with major revisions
• Rejected

Revision Process

Authors are required to revise their manuscripts according to reviewers’ comments within the specified timeframe. Revised manuscripts may be returned to reviewers for further evaluation if necessary.

Review Timeline

The review process typically takes 1–2 weeks, depending on reviewer availability and manuscript complexity.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share or use the content for personal purposes.

Reviewer Ethics

Reviewers are expected to:

• Provide objective and constructive feedback
• Maintain confidentiality
• Avoid conflicts of interest
• Submit reviews in a timely manner